Talk:SCRUM Method
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss in your articl...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss in your article. Maybe you have a particular aspect to look at, study in your article. | Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss in your article. Maybe you have a particular aspect to look at, study in your article. | ||
| + | Reviewer 2 :Andkamp | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Great interest on the method described on the article, with nice structure and points | ||
| + | *Nice style, with precise sentences, but maybe it needs a little improvement in English as it has some minor mistakes | ||
| + | *Nice figures, but better quality and explanation of them would be appreciated | ||
| + | *Better structure as a wiki article would be preferable as there are no inter-wiki or other in text hyperlinks | ||
| + | *Do not know if the author has the right to use those images as there is no reference | ||
| + | *Pictures could nicely placed | ||
| + | *Scrum method seems highly interesting for a practitioner, although no real implementation were presented in the article | ||
| + | *Firmly related to the topic of project management | ||
| + | *Appropriate length, although points 2.1.1-2.2.5 could be a little more extensive | ||
| + | *More things could be added in the introduction section | ||
| + | *One sided sources and only sites, no proper literature | ||
| + | *Could be connected with other articles through a see also section | ||
| + | *Could add some real examples of implementation of this method | ||
Revision as of 17:29, 22 September 2015
Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss in your article. Maybe you have a particular aspect to look at, study in your article.
Reviewer 2 :Andkamp
- Great interest on the method described on the article, with nice structure and points
- Nice style, with precise sentences, but maybe it needs a little improvement in English as it has some minor mistakes
- Nice figures, but better quality and explanation of them would be appreciated
- Better structure as a wiki article would be preferable as there are no inter-wiki or other in text hyperlinks
- Do not know if the author has the right to use those images as there is no reference
- Pictures could nicely placed
- Scrum method seems highly interesting for a practitioner, although no real implementation were presented in the article
- Firmly related to the topic of project management
- Appropriate length, although points 2.1.1-2.2.5 could be a little more extensive
- More things could be added in the introduction section
- One sided sources and only sites, no proper literature
- Could be connected with other articles through a see also section
- Could add some real examples of implementation of this method
