Talk:Stakeholder Analysis and Matrices
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* The article was interesting and easy to read. It is very much related for the course and relevant for practitioners. | * The article was interesting and easy to read. It is very much related for the course and relevant for practitioners. | ||
| − | * In general, it follows a logical flow and has a good structure. | + | * In general, it follows a logical flow and has a good structure. |
* You have used a good vocabulary and short and concise sentences. | * You have used a good vocabulary and short and concise sentences. | ||
| − | * I like what you have written so far in the ''Background'' section. In my opinion, if you take care of this section, you can improve the overall quality of the article. | + | * I like what you have written so far in the ''Background'' section. In my opinion, if you take care of this section, you can improve the overall quality of the article. ''I tried to fill it in with some more information'' |
| − | * I would suggest you clarify the ''Discussion'' section, or reconsider if it should be placed after both ''Stakeholder analysis'' and ''Stakeholder matrix''. | + | * I would suggest you clarify the ''Discussion'' section, or reconsider if it should be placed after both ''Stakeholder analysis'' and ''Stakeholder matrix''. ''I fixed this'' |
| − | * At the moment, I find the article short, although I can see you will add more text. | + | * At the moment, I find the article short, although I can see you will add more text. |
| − | * I think you should talk with the teacher whether or not you should personalize the process ''(your stakeholders, make a list)''. You could miss the objective and factual value of the text. | + | * I think you should talk with the teacher whether or not you should personalize the process ''(your stakeholders, make a list)''. You could miss the objective and factual value of the text. ''Changed everything'' |
| − | * The ''Skateholder analysis matrix'' figure seems a bit simple. However, the figure 2 is easy and fast to understand and well explained in the text. | + | * The ''Skateholder analysis matrix'' figure seems a bit simple. However, the figure 2 is easy and fast to understand and well explained in the text. ''Changed the picture and added information about the other one'' |
| − | * I recommend you make a section for limitations of the process, so you approach even more to the method structure. | + | * I recommend you make a section for limitations of the process, so you approach even more to the method structure. ''Added this'' |
| − | * Finally, I think you should place the number of the references 3 and 4 at the end of sentences. | + | * Finally, I think you should place the number of the references 3 and 4 at the end of sentences. ''Fixed this'' |
| + | |||
| + | ''Thanks for the good comments'' | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
## The figures give a good overview of the theory and methods | ## The figures give a good overview of the theory and methods | ||
# '''Missing content and formalities''' | # '''Missing content and formalities''' | ||
| − | ## Remember to add table numberings on your final article | + | ## Remember to add table numberings on your final article ''Added'' |
| − | ## The annotated bibliography seem like an important part of the article, so remember to do so when finishing the article. | + | ## The annotated bibliography seem like an important part of the article, so remember to do so when finishing the article. ''Didn't really understand this, but made it better'' |
# '''Suggestions''' | # '''Suggestions''' | ||
| − | ## Try to link your subject to other relevant articles. | + | ## Try to link your subject to other relevant articles. |
| − | ## The discussion between the stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix is well placed, but keep in mind to focus on the red thread between the chapters, when you fill in the missing information. | + | ## The discussion between the stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix is well placed, but keep in mind to focus on the red thread between the chapters, when you fill in the missing information. ''You are right'' |
# '''Additional comments''' | # '''Additional comments''' | ||
## Looking forward to review your finished article | ## Looking forward to review your finished article | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Thanks for the good comments'' | ||
| Line 37: | Line 41: | ||
I really like how you have shown the academic background, probably could be even more interesting if you can write a basic practical example. It could be for example a stakeholder analysis regarding a house-building project. | I really like how you have shown the academic background, probably could be even more interesting if you can write a basic practical example. It could be for example a stakeholder analysis regarding a house-building project. | ||
*Figure 1: | *Figure 1: | ||
| − | This figure is positioned in a way that the reader does not understand the link between picture and Article section. It will be clearer if you mention this picture to the text. | + | This figure is positioned in a way that the reader does not understand the link between picture and Article section. It will be clearer if you mention this picture to the text. ''Removed this and added another one which I included'' |
*Stakeholder Analysis: | *Stakeholder Analysis: | ||
| Line 43: | Line 47: | ||
*Discussion | *Discussion | ||
| − | It will be interesting to analyze the limitations of a Stakeholder Analysis in real case application. E.g, hidden stakeholders. | + | It will be interesting to analyze the limitations of a Stakeholder Analysis in real case application. E.g, hidden stakeholders. ''Added hidden stakeholders'' |
*EXTRA | *EXTRA | ||
| Line 56: | Line 60: | ||
This will provide a link to topics discussed in class during the previous lessons. | This will provide a link to topics discussed in class during the previous lessons. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Thanks for the good comments'' | ||
Latest revision as of 15:32, 29 September 2015
Mette: Hello, I like your idea. It seems like you have a clear agenda of what you want to write about. Maybe you could have a discussion between the use of stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix.
Reviewer 2: s142581
- The article was interesting and easy to read. It is very much related for the course and relevant for practitioners.
- In general, it follows a logical flow and has a good structure.
- You have used a good vocabulary and short and concise sentences.
- I like what you have written so far in the Background section. In my opinion, if you take care of this section, you can improve the overall quality of the article. I tried to fill it in with some more information
- I would suggest you clarify the Discussion section, or reconsider if it should be placed after both Stakeholder analysis and Stakeholder matrix. I fixed this
- At the moment, I find the article short, although I can see you will add more text.
- I think you should talk with the teacher whether or not you should personalize the process (your stakeholders, make a list). You could miss the objective and factual value of the text. Changed everything
- The Skateholder analysis matrix figure seems a bit simple. However, the figure 2 is easy and fast to understand and well explained in the text. Changed the picture and added information about the other one
- I recommend you make a section for limitations of the process, so you approach even more to the method structure. Added this
- Finally, I think you should place the number of the references 3 and 4 at the end of sentences. Fixed this
Thanks for the good comments
Reviewer 3: S102935
- Pros
- Highly relevant topic
- Very good, clear and engaging agenda/introduction.
- Good explanation of both Stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix.
- The figures give a good overview of the theory and methods
- Missing content and formalities
- Remember to add table numberings on your final article Added
- The annotated bibliography seem like an important part of the article, so remember to do so when finishing the article. Didn't really understand this, but made it better
- Suggestions
- Try to link your subject to other relevant articles.
- The discussion between the stakeholder analysis and stakeholder matrix is well placed, but keep in mind to focus on the red thread between the chapters, when you fill in the missing information. You are right
- Additional comments
- Looking forward to review your finished article
Thanks for the good comments
Reviewer 1, s141530:
- Background Section:
I really like how you have shown the academic background, probably could be even more interesting if you can write a basic practical example. It could be for example a stakeholder analysis regarding a house-building project.
- Figure 1:
This figure is positioned in a way that the reader does not understand the link between picture and Article section. It will be clearer if you mention this picture to the text. Removed this and added another one which I included
- Stakeholder Analysis:
In my opinion Stakeholder Analysis is a broad topic, due to this consideration, I would suggest dividing this section into other subsections.
- Discussion
It will be interesting to analyze the limitations of a Stakeholder Analysis in real case application. E.g, hidden stakeholders. Added hidden stakeholders
- EXTRA
If you would like to provide a practical case. I suggest to present this example in 3 different points of view:
For instance regarding an house-building project.
- Project’s Stakeholders(house)
- Program’s Stakeholders (Renewal of the district)
- Portfolio’s Stakeholders (State investment)
This will provide a link to topics discussed in class during the previous lessons.
Thanks for the good comments
