Talk:Systems Engineering versus Project Management, a comparative study
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
LasseMadsen (Talk | contribs) |
LasseMadsen (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Fist impression:''' <br> | '''Fist impression:''' <br> | ||
* The article is very well structured, and invites the reader to read along. | * The article is very well structured, and invites the reader to read along. | ||
| − | * The grammar and spelling is very good, and the content is easy to understand | + | * The grammar and spelling is very good, and the content is easy to understand, due to the structure and grammar. I would though, suggest to make it bullet proof by adding additional "," where sentences get long. Especially towards the end of the article. |
| − | ''' | + | '''Formal aspects''' |
| − | i miss some more WIKI formatting, ie. | + | *I would put the introduction before the content to provide a read threat. |
| − | + | *i miss some more WIKI formatting, ie. | |
**Categories: <nowiki>[[Categories:Management]]</nowiki> | **Categories: <nowiki>[[Categories:Management]]</nowiki> | ||
| − | **References: <nowiki>[[project management]]</nowiki> | + | **References to other wiki sites: <nowiki>[[project management]]</nowiki> |
| − | ** | + | **Figures could alternatively be in the right hand side in stead of as part of the text. The problem is, that if you have a small screen, the figures will go out of the screen. '''Code:''' <nowiki>[[File:FILENAME.png|200px|thumb|right|FIGURE TEXT]]</nowiki> |
| + | ** I miss figure text. Could be solved by the method above. | ||
| + | * I would consider to use the references more than once like: this <ref name="Example">Hasan, Helen, and Alanah Kazlauskas. "The Cynefin framework: putting complexity into perspective." (2014): 55. </ref>, then the same reference could be used here <ref name="Example"/> and here <ref name="Example"/> and even here <ref name="Example"/> as well :-). (look into the code of this to see how it could be done, if you are interested. | ||
| + | * Maybe include figure references, if the figures is not reproduced by the author of the article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Content aspects''' | ||
| + | * The article clearly relates to the course, and provides a good overview of methods of systems enginnering vs. project management. | ||
| + | * The references used including the way of referring is very good. I would though suggest to use the references more than once, especially when stating | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Used for reference example''' | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 25 November 2014
Feedback by Lasse Madsen
Fist impression:
- The article is very well structured, and invites the reader to read along.
- The grammar and spelling is very good, and the content is easy to understand, due to the structure and grammar. I would though, suggest to make it bullet proof by adding additional "," where sentences get long. Especially towards the end of the article.
Formal aspects
- I would put the introduction before the content to provide a read threat.
- i miss some more WIKI formatting, ie.
- Categories: [[Categories:Management]]
- References to other wiki sites: [[project management]]
- Figures could alternatively be in the right hand side in stead of as part of the text. The problem is, that if you have a small screen, the figures will go out of the screen. Code: [[File:FILENAME.png|200px|thumb|right|FIGURE TEXT]]
- I miss figure text. Could be solved by the method above.
- I would consider to use the references more than once like: this [1], then the same reference could be used here [1] and here [1] and even here [1] as well :-). (look into the code of this to see how it could be done, if you are interested.
- Maybe include figure references, if the figures is not reproduced by the author of the article.
Content aspects
- The article clearly relates to the course, and provides a good overview of methods of systems enginnering vs. project management.
- The references used including the way of referring is very good. I would though suggest to use the references more than once, especially when stating
Used for reference example
