Talk:The benefits of systems engineering

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(S150801 Reviewer 1)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
It is a bit hard to comment on your structure when it is not completed, but so far it seems good.
 
It is a bit hard to comment on your structure when it is not completed, but so far it seems good.
 +
 +
==S141931 Reviewer 2==
 +
* As I can see, the article is not finished, however the topic sounds to be interesting and I would like to read it when it is done
 +
* Writing language and style is of good quality, yet I do not think it is professional to mention personal relations to the topic
 +
* Seems like you have a good framework of writing, you use the references, figures, and have a total contents of the article in mind, I believe it can become a good article when you finish it

Revision as of 23:55, 22 September 2015

Mette: Looking forward to read more of your article when it is more completed.

KB1991, reviewer 3:

  • I have an idea that the article isn’t completely finished yet ☺ But when looking at the structure of it and the headlines it looks good - Both the formatting and the read threat.
  • Good that you have planned to implement figures to illustrate the text.
  • There are a few mistakes where words have been swapped, like writing ‘with’ instead of ‘which’.
  • Good that there are references to all the text – And looks like the sources is of good quality.
  • Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺


Contents

S150801 Reviewer 1

The Benefits of Systems Engineering

Overall impression

I can see that you are not quite finished her yet. However, I am looking forward to read it when completed.

  • I think it is an article with a good flow and easy to read.
  • I like your consequent use where to put your references.
  • And I think it is good that you are referring to illustrations in you text, I think this will make it easier to understand your points.

Rooms for improvement

  • You are talking about many interesting topics, but I am a bit concern that you are covering too much topics in this article.
  • I would be a bit careful to draw in too many personal experiences. (Like you mention in the Summary)
  • Maybe you can link to other articles in you text, for example where you talk about PERT charts.
  • I also think you can make the paragraphs smaller, but I think this will fix it self when you get the diagrams in.

It is a bit hard to comment on your structure when it is not completed, but so far it seems good.

S141931 Reviewer 2

  • As I can see, the article is not finished, however the topic sounds to be interesting and I would like to read it when it is done
  • Writing language and style is of good quality, yet I do not think it is professional to mention personal relations to the topic
  • Seems like you have a good framework of writing, you use the references, figures, and have a total contents of the article in mind, I believe it can become a good article when you finish it
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox