Talk:V-Model
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper. | * The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper. | ||
* Not all the references appear to be of high quality | * Not all the references appear to be of high quality | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Ch.filis, Review 2: Hello, and straight to the point. Really analytical explanation and description of the method. I had the opportunity while reading it, to understand how the methods works. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Formal Aspects:''' | ||
| + | *The article has a logical flow and every part is “built” on another | ||
| + | *I could not notice any obvious grammar mistakes | ||
| + | *The images illustrate your writings in a clear and understandable way | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Content Aspects:''' | ||
| + | *The introduction describes the model in a clear way | ||
| + | *Analysis in depth for all the phases required in order to formulate the model | ||
| + | *Not so clear how the model was used in the industry | ||
| + | *Understandable description of the model’s limitations and advantages as well | ||
| + | *Quite few references for so extensive analysis but probably the author’s experience can cover parts of the subject | ||
Revision as of 19:52, 22 September 2015
Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.
s150905, Review 1: Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject
Formal aspects
- The article follow the right method’s structure.
- The few images used are very focused and understandable.
- There is a lack in blank spaces and paragraphs’ division in the section, which might help the reader.
Content
- The introduction is very clear and illustrative.
- The topic clearly developed, underling the essential aspects in a precise way.
- The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper.
- Not all the references appear to be of high quality
Ch.filis, Review 2: Hello, and straight to the point. Really analytical explanation and description of the method. I had the opportunity while reading it, to understand how the methods works.
Formal Aspects:
- The article has a logical flow and every part is “built” on another
- I could not notice any obvious grammar mistakes
- The images illustrate your writings in a clear and understandable way
Content Aspects:
- The introduction describes the model in a clear way
- Analysis in depth for all the phases required in order to formulate the model
- Not so clear how the model was used in the industry
- Understandable description of the model’s limitations and advantages as well
- Quite few references for so extensive analysis but probably the author’s experience can cover parts of the subject
