Talk:V-Model

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.
 
Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.
  
s150905, Review 1:
+
==Review 1: s150905==
 
Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject  
 
Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject  
  

Revision as of 11:06, 24 September 2015

Anna: Very nice topic and method you have chosen. I don't have a lot of comments as it seems that you are well within the requirements for the article and that you have already created a great structure including the application and limitations.

Review 1: s150905

Hi, the illustration of the method is really engaging and interesting for the subject

Formal aspects

  • The article follow the right method’s structure.
  • The few images used are very focused and understandable.
  • There is a lack in blank spaces and paragraphs’ division in the section, which might help the reader.

Content

  • The introduction is very clear and illustrative.
  • The topic clearly developed, underling the essential aspects in a precise way.
  • The method description maybe seems sometimes a little much specific and the reader could find difficulties in following the parts depicted; but here the example you have made could act as a helper.
  • Not all the references appear to be of high quality


Ch.filis, Review 2: Hello, and straight to the point. Really analytical explanation and description of the method. I had the opportunity while reading it, to understand how the methods works.

Formal Aspects:

  • The article has a logical flow and every part is “built” on another
  • I could not notice any obvious grammar mistakes
  • The images illustrate your writings in a clear and understandable way

Content Aspects:

  • The introduction describes the model in a clear way
  • Analysis in depth for all the phases required in order to formulate the model
  • Not so clear how the model was used in the industry
  • Understandable description of the model’s limitations and advantages as well
  • Quite few references for so extensive analysis but probably the author’s experience can cover parts of the subject
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox