Talk:Work Breakdown Structure in Construction Management

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Abstract Feedback)
(Abstract Feedback)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well addressed, but try to use the word "scope" in the abstract - as in a work breakdown structure is a tool used breakdown the scope of a project
 
'''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Well addressed, but try to use the word "scope" in the abstract - as in a work breakdown structure is a tool used breakdown the scope of a project
  
'''Purpose explanation''' Good, but needs development. Consider:
+
'''Purpose explanation''' Well explained, but consider:
  
 
<ol>
 
<ol>

Revision as of 13:54, 16 February 2018

Abstract Feedback

Text clarity Text is good, but avoid writing bullet points in the abstract - the text should flow

Language Good

Description of the tool/theory/concept Well addressed, but try to use the word "scope" in the abstract - as in a work breakdown structure is a tool used breakdown the scope of a project

Purpose explanation Well explained, but consider:

  1. Who is the reader? Project Manager or team etc?

References Missing references to the list of mandatory references/standards

Relevance of article Consider the following:

  1. It is okay to use examples from the Metro Cityring project, but remember it is not allowed to write the article as a case study. The course requirements have changed
  2. Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox