Talk:Emotional Intelligence as a tool for Project Managers
The writing is good and easy to read and understand.
use [1] for references and then just put- ↑ put_your_reference_here
(click on the edit tab to see the code for this)
Contents |
Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Durant Mangum
Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 1
I really enjoyed reading your summary and thought it was brief but also descriptive of the article.
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2
The article follows a logical break down, just needs more I feel.
Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3
Grammar was fine! "
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4
No tables and figures, but that is okay, I am sure you are working on them now!”
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5
It seems relevant to project management because being a leader and understanding how people’s emotions affect their job and performance is of crucial importance
Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6
I would really have enjoyed a guide on how exactly I could use the interesting information on emotion.'
Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7
"I am sure you will add one.