Talk:Value Stream Mapping in Program Management
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Response to the Peer Review) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Remember to put in references especially where you define what what VSM is and where you also define other stuff | *Remember to put in references especially where you define what what VSM is and where you also define other stuff | ||
| − | *<ref name="Name"> What </ref>. | + | *This is done like this <ref name="Name"> What </ref>. If you use the same ref again just type this <ref name="Name"></ref> |
| + | |||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
*I hope you will do great but i have no chance of giving you more feedback right now | *I hope you will do great but i have no chance of giving you more feedback right now | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Comments from "Pppm student" == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The pointed sections seems nice and would have been interesting to read. Especially the example would be nice to get to know the method. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * It would be nice for the reader if the VSA and VSM are explained simply in the start of the introduction, but maybe it is not done so far. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Again it would be good with more then the abstract and very short introduction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Response to the Peer Reviews == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === To Tallimac === | ||
| + | |||
| + | *The headline issue has been solved by reformulating the section | ||
| + | *The difference between VSA and VSM has been farther distinguished | ||
| + | *References have been made | ||
| + | *References have been made | ||
| + | |||
| + | === To PPPM Student === | ||
| + | |||
| + | *The plan about examples has been rejected, because of property rights everywhere | ||
| + | *VSA/VSM has been described briefly in the introduction | ||
| + | *The article has been extended in quality and quantity | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for your reviews! | ||
Latest revision as of 16:27, 4 December 2014
Contents |
[edit] Feedback from Tallimac
- "The method addressed by the headline is Value Stream Mapping" A bit weird formulation as a headline cannot address anything. You decide what the article is about and you write it not the headline :)
- really good to tell about the VSM and compare it with the VSA - Maybe tell about what came first and how is the one thing developed from the other
- Remember to put in references especially where you define what what VSM is and where you also define other stuff
- This is done like this [1]. If you use the same ref again just type this [1]
[edit] References
- I hope you will do great but i have no chance of giving you more feedback right now
[edit] Comments from "Pppm student"
- The pointed sections seems nice and would have been interesting to read. Especially the example would be nice to get to know the method.
- It would be nice for the reader if the VSA and VSM are explained simply in the start of the introduction, but maybe it is not done so far.
- Again it would be good with more then the abstract and very short introduction.
[edit] Response to the Peer Reviews
[edit] To Tallimac
- The headline issue has been solved by reformulating the section
- The difference between VSA and VSM has been farther distinguished
- References have been made
- References have been made
[edit] To PPPM Student
- The plan about examples has been rejected, because of property rights everywhere
- VSA/VSM has been described briefly in the introduction
- The article has been extended in quality and quantity
Thanks for your reviews!
