Talk:Value Stream Mapping in Program Management

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comments from "Apppm student": new section)
(Response to the Peer Review)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
*I hope you will do great but i have no chance of giving you more feedback right now
 
*I hope you will do great but i have no chance of giving you more feedback right now
  
== Comments from "Apppm student" ==
+
== Comments from "Pppm student" ==
  
 
* The pointed sections seems nice and would have been interesting to read. Especially the example would be nice to get to know the method.
 
* The pointed sections seems nice and would have been interesting to read. Especially the example would be nice to get to know the method.
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
* Again it would be good with more then the abstract and very short introduction.
 
* Again it would be good with more then the abstract and very short introduction.
 +
 +
== Response to the Peer Reviews ==
 +
 +
=== To Tallimac ===
 +
 +
*The headline issue has been solved by reformulating the section
 +
*The difference between VSA and VSM has been farther distinguished
 +
*References have been made
 +
*References have been made
 +
 +
=== To PPPM Student ===
 +
 +
*The plan about examples has been rejected, because of property rights everywhere
 +
*VSA/VSM has been described briefly in the introduction
 +
*The article has been extended in quality and quantity
 +
 +
Thanks for your reviews!

Latest revision as of 16:27, 4 December 2014

Contents

[edit] Feedback from Tallimac

  • "The method addressed by the headline is Value Stream Mapping" A bit weird formulation as a headline cannot address anything. You decide what the article is about and you write it not the headline :)
  • really good to tell about the VSM and compare it with the VSA - Maybe tell about what came first and how is the one thing developed from the other
  • Remember to put in references especially where you define what what VSM is and where you also define other stuff
  • This is done like this [1]. If you use the same ref again just type this [1]

[edit] References

  1. 1.0 1.1 What


  • I hope you will do great but i have no chance of giving you more feedback right now

[edit] Comments from "Pppm student"

  • The pointed sections seems nice and would have been interesting to read. Especially the example would be nice to get to know the method.
  • It would be nice for the reader if the VSA and VSM are explained simply in the start of the introduction, but maybe it is not done so far.
  • Again it would be good with more then the abstract and very short introduction.

[edit] Response to the Peer Reviews

[edit] To Tallimac

  • The headline issue has been solved by reformulating the section
  • The difference between VSA and VSM has been farther distinguished
  • References have been made
  • References have been made

[edit] To PPPM Student

  • The plan about examples has been rejected, because of property rights everywhere
  • VSA/VSM has been described briefly in the introduction
  • The article has been extended in quality and quantity

Thanks for your reviews!

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox