Talk:Value Stream Mapping in Program Management
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Pppm student (Talk | contribs) (→Comments from "Apppm student") |
(→Response to the Peer Review) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Again it would be good with more then the abstract and very short introduction. | * Again it would be good with more then the abstract and very short introduction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Response to the Peer Reviews == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === To Tallimac === | ||
| + | |||
| + | *The headline issue has been solved by reformulating the section | ||
| + | *The difference between VSA and VSM has been farther distinguished | ||
| + | *References have been made | ||
| + | *References have been made | ||
| + | |||
| + | === To PPPM Student === | ||
| + | |||
| + | *The plan about examples has been rejected, because of property rights everywhere | ||
| + | *VSA/VSM has been described briefly in the introduction | ||
| + | *The article has been extended in quality and quantity | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for your reviews! | ||
Latest revision as of 16:27, 4 December 2014
Contents |
[edit] Feedback from Tallimac
- "The method addressed by the headline is Value Stream Mapping" A bit weird formulation as a headline cannot address anything. You decide what the article is about and you write it not the headline :)
- really good to tell about the VSM and compare it with the VSA - Maybe tell about what came first and how is the one thing developed from the other
- Remember to put in references especially where you define what what VSM is and where you also define other stuff
- This is done like this [1]. If you use the same ref again just type this [1]
[edit] References
- I hope you will do great but i have no chance of giving you more feedback right now
[edit] Comments from "Pppm student"
- The pointed sections seems nice and would have been interesting to read. Especially the example would be nice to get to know the method.
- It would be nice for the reader if the VSA and VSM are explained simply in the start of the introduction, but maybe it is not done so far.
- Again it would be good with more then the abstract and very short introduction.
[edit] Response to the Peer Reviews
[edit] To Tallimac
- The headline issue has been solved by reformulating the section
- The difference between VSA and VSM has been farther distinguished
- References have been made
- References have been made
[edit] To PPPM Student
- The plan about examples has been rejected, because of property rights everywhere
- VSA/VSM has been described briefly in the introduction
- The article has been extended in quality and quantity
Thanks for your reviews!
