Talk:Project Vision Statement
| (2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: The gramme is en general fine. | + | Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? |
| + | LBH: | ||
| + | - The gramme is en general fine. | ||
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? | Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. | - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. | ||
- Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"? | - Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"? | ||
| − | + | - Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now. | |
| − | What do you like? What should be improved, and how? | + | |
| + | What do you like? | ||
| + | LBH: | ||
| + | - Good and relevant subject and good use of examples. | ||
| + | - What should be improved, and how? Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Content: Is the article convincing? | ||
| + | LBH: | ||
| + | - Semi. More clarity of the purpose is needed, but if this is defined it will be. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? | ||
| + | LBH: | ||
| + | More detain of the topic would favour the article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | What parts do you like? | ||
| + | LBH: | ||
| + | - The section with exampels and limitation is good. | ||
| − | + | What parts need to be improve | |
| + | LBH: | ||
| + | - More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:38, 25 February 2019
Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: - The gramme is en general fine.
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? LBH: - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. - Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"? - Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now.
What do you like? LBH: - Good and relevant subject and good use of examples. - What should be improved, and how? Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article.
Content: Is the article convincing? LBH: - Semi. More clarity of the purpose is needed, but if this is defined it will be.
Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? LBH: More detain of the topic would favour the article.
What parts do you like? LBH: - The section with exampels and limitation is good.
What parts need to be improve LBH: - More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article.
