Participatory Design

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 
== Abstract ==
 
== Abstract ==
The purpose of this article is to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of the key concepts of participatory design, where it comes from, and how it can be applied practically to project management to improve project outcomes.
+
Participatory design is a collaborative approach to designing products, services, and systems that involves all stakeholders in the design process. This article provides an overview of participatory design, including its key concepts and methods, and explores its application to project, program, and portfolio management. The article also critically reflects on the limitations of participatory design, and its potential impact on the design and development of innovative solutions.
 
+
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
  
=== What is Participatory Design? ===
+
Participatory Design (PD) is a user-centered collaborative design approach that aims to involve all relevant stakeholders in the design process, enabling them to become co-creators of products and services (Sanders and Stappers, 2014). This approach gives designers the ability to understand and empower users by giving them a voice in the design process, allowing them to contribute their knowledge and expertise to the development of products and services that meet their needs (Spinuzzi, 2005). The principles of participatory design align with Jonathan Grudin's (an influential computer and principal design researcher) assertion that the design of technology should focus on the user and their needs, rather than being solely driven by technical considerations (Grudin, 1990).
 +
 
 +
Co-creation is a key aspect of participatory design, involving the creation of new knowledge and solutions through collaboration between designers and stakeholders (Sanders and Stappers, 2008). Participatory design builds on the work of cooperative design, which was developed in Scandinavia in the 1980s and focused on the involvement of users in the design process (Bødker et al., 1993).
 +
 
  
*Participatory design is a collaborative design approach that involves users and key stakeholders in the design process of a product, service, or system to develop a result that reflects the requirements of both stakeholders and end-users.
+
PD can be applied to project, program, and portfolio management by involving stakeholders in the design and decision-making process (Muller and Kuhn, 1993). This involvement can lead to more effective outcomes by ensuring that the needs and concerns of stakeholders are taken into account (Sanders and Stappers, 2014). PD can also help to build trust and collaboration among stakeholders, leading to more positive relationships and better project outcomes (Muller and Kuhn, 1993).
  
 
=== Background ===
 
=== Background ===
Line 19: Line 21:
 
*Explore market to match products/services with demand <ref name=''Yamauchi''> '' Yamauchi, Y. (2012). Participatory Design. In: Ishida, T. (eds) Field Informatics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi-org.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/10.1007/978-3-642-29006-0_8 '' </ref>
 
*Explore market to match products/services with demand <ref name=''Yamauchi''> '' Yamauchi, Y. (2012). Participatory Design. In: Ishida, T. (eds) Field Informatics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi-org.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/10.1007/978-3-642-29006-0_8 '' </ref>
  
==== Participatory Design as Opponent Processing ====
+
Participatory design involves a range of methods, including probes, toolkits, and prototypes, to support collaboration between designers and stakeholders (Sanders and Stappers, 2014). Probes are designed to explore the context of use and generate new insights into user needs and behaviors. Toolkits are sets of tools and resources that are designed to support collaboration between designers and stakeholders. Prototypes are physical or digital models of a design that are used to test and refine ideas.
Opponent-process theory originated from 19th century German physiologist Ewald Hering as a way of understanding how our visual systems process information. He found that in order to see color, we have three sets cone cells in our retina, each sensitive to different colors. He also noted that the stimulation of one type of cone cell inhibited activity in it's opposite. Since then, we have found countless psychological and neurological examples of this concept (sympathetic vs. parasympathetic nervous sub-systems, pleasure-pain centers, etc.) The key idea here is that incorporating differing frames of reference when it comes to information processing has an overall adaptive benefit to the organism. These sub-systems, although opposing, are not adversaries. They are both in service of a transcendent process, the adaptation and success of the organism that they are a part of.
+
  
Adversarial processing, on the other hand, is something commonly seen in legal proceedings or other competitive situations where two or more parties have conflicting interests. This frame presumes a zero-sum game in which for one side the win, the other must lose. Imagine a situation where our nervous system is engaged in adversarial processing. The sympathetic "fight or flight" sub-system does everything in its power to defeat the parasympathetic. It finds ways to constantly sabotage the other side until it finally prevails. The result? It's host goes into cardiac arrest and perishes. Both systems cease to be.
+
Inspiration card workshops are a participatory design method that can help generate ideas and facilitate communication between designers and stakeholders (Halskov and Dalsgaard, 2006). In these workshops, participants are presented with a series of cards that contain prompts or images related to the design problem. Participants use these cards to generate ideas and discuss potential solutions.
  
If we take a moment to zoom out and consider managing projects in a larger organization, these same concepts apply. Each key stakeholder or user involved in a process is like a type of cone in the retina. Each has their unique perspective and values, which contribute integrally to the success of the overall process. It is vital as project managers, that we develop this frame of opponent processing. When we understand that others hold a perspective that can fill in the gaps of our understanding, we can value their input and treat it as a contribution to the greater whole rather than trying to undermine others and work to get our idea to "win". Allowing and encouraging opponent processing in participatory design leads to better project outcomes.
+
Participatory design with proxies, such as developing a desktop-pen for elderly users, can help ensure that the needs of all stakeholders are considered (Ylirisku and Buur, 2007). Proxies are designed to represent the interests and needs of stakeholders who may not be able to participate directly in the design process, such as children or elderly users. By involving proxies in the design process, designers can ensure that the needs of all stakeholders are considered, even if they are not present in the design process.
  
 
=== Methodology ===
 
=== Methodology ===
Line 64: Line 65:
 
*Issues with scaling (anonymity and computer systems)
 
*Issues with scaling (anonymity and computer systems)
 
*Uncertain future development
 
*Uncertain future development
 +
 +
While participatory design can be an effective way to involve stakeholders in the design process, it may face challenges in maintaining the long-term sustainability of the solutions it produces (Karasti and Baker, 2004). The involvement of stakeholders in the design process can be time-consuming and may require significant resources. Additionally, stakeholders may have conflicting interests or priorities, which can make it difficult to arrive at a consensus on the design solution.
 +
 +
Designing for specific user groups, such as those who are deaf, can present unique challenges in participatory design (Clement, 1994). These challenges may include finding appropriate ways to involve stakeholders who may have limited communication skills or who may not be able to participate directly in the design process.
 +
 +
Inspiration card workshops may not be appropriate for all design projects and contexts (Halskov and Dalsgaard, 2006). These workshops may not be effective if the
 +
Hank Svensson
 +
please continue where you left off
 +
 +
participants are not familiar with the design problem or if there is a lack of trust between the stakeholders and the designers. In addition, some participants may dominate the discussion, which can limit the input of other stakeholders.
 +
 +
Participatory design can also face challenges in implementation, particularly in large organizations where there may be resistance to change (Bergvall-Kåreborn et al., 2009). Participatory design may require changes to existing workflows or processes, which can be difficult to implement. Additionally, stakeholders may not always have the necessary resources or expertise to participate effectively in the design process.
 +
 +
Despite these challenges, participatory design has the potential to produce more innovative and effective solutions by involving all stakeholders in the design process (Björgvinsson et al., 2012). By engaging stakeholders in the design process, designers can gain a better understanding of the user's needs, which can lead to more effective and user-friendly solutions.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
 
<references />
 
<references />

Revision as of 13:35, 1 April 2023

Contents

Abstract

Participatory design is a collaborative approach to designing products, services, and systems that involves all stakeholders in the design process. This article provides an overview of participatory design, including its key concepts and methods, and explores its application to project, program, and portfolio management. The article also critically reflects on the limitations of participatory design, and its potential impact on the design and development of innovative solutions.

Overview

Participatory Design (PD) is a user-centered collaborative design approach that aims to involve all relevant stakeholders in the design process, enabling them to become co-creators of products and services (Sanders and Stappers, 2014). This approach gives designers the ability to understand and empower users by giving them a voice in the design process, allowing them to contribute their knowledge and expertise to the development of products and services that meet their needs (Spinuzzi, 2005). The principles of participatory design align with Jonathan Grudin's (an influential computer and principal design researcher) assertion that the design of technology should focus on the user and their needs, rather than being solely driven by technical considerations (Grudin, 1990).

Co-creation is a key aspect of participatory design, involving the creation of new knowledge and solutions through collaboration between designers and stakeholders (Sanders and Stappers, 2008). Participatory design builds on the work of cooperative design, which was developed in Scandinavia in the 1980s and focused on the involvement of users in the design process (Bødker et al., 1993).


PD can be applied to project, program, and portfolio management by involving stakeholders in the design and decision-making process (Muller and Kuhn, 1993). This involvement can lead to more effective outcomes by ensuring that the needs and concerns of stakeholders are taken into account (Sanders and Stappers, 2014). PD can also help to build trust and collaboration among stakeholders, leading to more positive relationships and better project outcomes (Muller and Kuhn, 1993).

Background

  • Participatory design originated in Scandinavia in the 1970s [1]
  • "PD emerged in the context of computer-based systems development." [2]

Application

Why Use Participatory Design?

  • Explore market to match products/services with demand [3]

Participatory design involves a range of methods, including probes, toolkits, and prototypes, to support collaboration between designers and stakeholders (Sanders and Stappers, 2014). Probes are designed to explore the context of use and generate new insights into user needs and behaviors. Toolkits are sets of tools and resources that are designed to support collaboration between designers and stakeholders. Prototypes are physical or digital models of a design that are used to test and refine ideas.

Inspiration card workshops are a participatory design method that can help generate ideas and facilitate communication between designers and stakeholders (Halskov and Dalsgaard, 2006). In these workshops, participants are presented with a series of cards that contain prompts or images related to the design problem. Participants use these cards to generate ideas and discuss potential solutions.

Participatory design with proxies, such as developing a desktop-pen for elderly users, can help ensure that the needs of all stakeholders are considered (Ylirisku and Buur, 2007). Proxies are designed to represent the interests and needs of stakeholders who may not be able to participate directly in the design process, such as children or elderly users. By involving proxies in the design process, designers can ensure that the needs of all stakeholders are considered, even if they are not present in the design process.

Methodology

  • Participatory design has traditionally been applied to software development, product/service design, and urban planning. It can be applied in the following steps:

1. Identify Stakeholders

Start by identifying the key stakeholders involved in the project, including: end-users, project sponsors and project team members.

2. Gather Feedback

Take time to understand the requirements and expectations from each relevant stakeholder regarding the project. Some common methods include interviews, surveys, and focus groups.

3. Co-design

Collaborate to develop the project plan, define the scope, and identify key milestones. Work through each phase of the process and collaborate with all stakeholders to ensure their requirements are met.

4. Prototype and Test

Create a working prototype. It should be made clear that the purpose of this stage is to develop an initial "minimum viable product". Test and refine using feedback from the relevant stakeholders.

5. Implement and Iterate

Once the design has been refined, it can be implemented. Track performance with relevant KPIs and make adjustments until the project requirements are met. As conditions evolve, the model may need to adjust to internal and external changes. This will likely be an iterative process to find the optimal solution.

Participatory Design Practices

  • Interview
  • Peer Observation
  • Cognitive Task Analysis
  • Analogous Inspiration
  • Survey


Limitations

Some common concerns regarding the field of Participatory design Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; refs with no content must have a name :

  • Lack of clarity (Confusion of terms, )
  • Depoliticization
  • Issues with scaling (anonymity and computer systems)
  • Uncertain future development

While participatory design can be an effective way to involve stakeholders in the design process, it may face challenges in maintaining the long-term sustainability of the solutions it produces (Karasti and Baker, 2004). The involvement of stakeholders in the design process can be time-consuming and may require significant resources. Additionally, stakeholders may have conflicting interests or priorities, which can make it difficult to arrive at a consensus on the design solution.

Designing for specific user groups, such as those who are deaf, can present unique challenges in participatory design (Clement, 1994). These challenges may include finding appropriate ways to involve stakeholders who may have limited communication skills or who may not be able to participate directly in the design process.

Inspiration card workshops may not be appropriate for all design projects and contexts (Halskov and Dalsgaard, 2006). These workshops may not be effective if the Hank Svensson please continue where you left off

participants are not familiar with the design problem or if there is a lack of trust between the stakeholders and the designers. In addition, some participants may dominate the discussion, which can limit the input of other stakeholders.

Participatory design can also face challenges in implementation, particularly in large organizations where there may be resistance to change (Bergvall-Kåreborn et al., 2009). Participatory design may require changes to existing workflows or processes, which can be difficult to implement. Additionally, stakeholders may not always have the necessary resources or expertise to participate effectively in the design process.

Despite these challenges, participatory design has the potential to produce more innovative and effective solutions by involving all stakeholders in the design process (Björgvinsson et al., 2012). By engaging stakeholders in the design process, designers can gain a better understanding of the user's needs, which can lead to more effective and user-friendly solutions.

References

  1. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders & Pieter Jan Stappers (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design, CoDesign, 4:1, 5-18, DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068
  2. Liam Bannon, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Susanne Bødker. 2018. Reimagining participatory design. interactions 26, 1 (January - February 2019), 26–32. https://doi-org.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/10.1145/3292015
  3. Yamauchi, Y. (2012). Participatory Design. In: Ishida, T. (eds) Field Informatics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi-org.proxy.findit.cvt.dk/10.1007/978-3-642-29006-0_8
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox