Talk:Gantt Chart: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
S117318 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
AugustinB (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
* Nice you are using the figures in your article.
* Nice you are using the figures in your article.
* Your language is easy to understand, great work.
* Your language is easy to understand, great work.
Wiki feedback from s142823
* Globally a nice article,well structured.
* Layout pleasant
* Some minor Grammatical mistakes
* Good idea to illustrate what is written with some GANTT pictures. However, maybe you should choose pictures easier to understand quickly.
* About the “Example of Managing a project with Gantt Charts”, it would be interesting to describe the all process more in detail with more illustrations such as one for the WBS
* Good presentation of references

Revision as of 16:03, 22 September 2015

Kristine: Great to see you have found a relevant tool to describe. Good to see you have the structure of the article all figured out.


Wiki feedback from s117318

  • Nice figures, great references
  • Be more specific for your topics. Fx. USE? Use of what? Edit the topic/headlines.
  • Could you make even more topic? 1. Use 1.1 Dependencies... 1.2 Critical Path.. 1.3 Ects...
  • Need discussion, maybe you could add more to the last topic "limitations"
  • Be more specific: For instance, Here is an example of how to use. Could you be more concrete? Avoid words like "here"
  • Great example, simple and easy to understand
  • I think you can add some more text!
  • Nice you are using the figures in your article.
  • Your language is easy to understand, great work.

Wiki feedback from s142823

  • Globally a nice article,well structured.
  • Layout pleasant
  • Some minor Grammatical mistakes
  • Good idea to illustrate what is written with some GANTT pictures. However, maybe you should choose pictures easier to understand quickly.
  • About the “Example of Managing a project with Gantt Charts”, it would be interesting to describe the all process more in detail with more illustrations such as one for the WBS
  • Good presentation of references