Talk:Project Vision Statement
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: The gramme is en general fine. | Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: The gramme is en general fine. | ||
| − | Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? LBH: Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. | + | Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? |
| + | LBH: | ||
| + | - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. | ||
| + | - Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"? | ||
What do you like? What should be improved, and how? | What do you like? What should be improved, and how? | ||
Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improve | Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improve | ||
Revision as of 18:27, 25 February 2019
Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: The gramme is en general fine.
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? LBH: - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. - Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"?
What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improve
