Talk:Project Vision Statement: Difference between revisions

From DTU ProjectLab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
S180230 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
S180230 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples.  
- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples.  
- Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"?   
- Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"?   
- Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now.
   
   
What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
What do you like? What should be improved, and how?


Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improve
Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improve

Revision as of 16:30, 25 February 2019

Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: The gramme is en general fine.

Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? LBH: - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples. - Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"? - Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now.

What do you like? What should be improved, and how?

Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improve