Portfolio Prioritization

Revision as of 13:21, 6 March 2020

This Wiki-page is currently under construction, and therefore may important information be missing. In case of any conflicts, please contact, Andy M Filipovic, s153501@student.dtu.dk

Introduction (Andy)

This Wiki page is a collection of tools and methods that we find relevant, in the development of a portfolio prioritization method/toolbox, in close collaboration with FL. Smidth.

Tools(Andy)

This chapter contains the different tool we intent to use during the portfolio prioritization process. The different tools will have short description of the tool and how it's intended use.

Tool 1: Scoring Method (Casper)

Definition

Practical guidelines /how to

Benefits and limitations

Tool 2: Bubble Diagram (Casper)

Definition

The bubble diagram is an illustrational tool used to support decision making in portfolio prioritization as well as other areas. The bubble diagram is a very simple, yet useful tool to map preferential values of a project. The values are mapped on an X-Y matrix, where each axis determine the desired value. The name bubble comes from the actual representation of the values in the matrix.

Practical guidelines /how to

The matrix as described is made up of either several dimensions of data, determined by the complexity of which is chosen. The mapping is often made on two variables, that is compared using the scoring method and mapped using bubbles in the matrix. Some of the variables often mapped against each other are:

Risk vs. Reward Strengths vs. Attractiveness Cost vs. Benefits Strategic vs. Benefit

Benefits and limitations

Tool 3: Portfolio selection (Magnus)

Definition

Due to increasing competition and development of technology, more innovative products are being developed by companies. It is a risky path to take, due to uncertainty in its feasibility and future commercial success, which makes each selection and evaluation crucial. Each project selection thus has a high correlation with the survival of a company. The most common methods used to select projects or portfolios are quantitative, qualitative and hybrid methods.

Practical guidelines /how to

Quantitative methods: These approaches focus on numerical information and ignore tacit knowledge and qualitative information. There are several dimensions of quantitative methods, the most common of them being mathematical programming.

Qualitative methods: The focus of qualitative is to take into account factors that quantitative methods cannot. Some of the most used are bubble diagrams, sensitivity analysis and benchmarking.

Hybrid methods: These are the most common methods for evaluating and selecting projects and portfolios today. In essence, these are a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods.

Further explanation of these methods can be found via: [1]

Tool 4: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Morten)

Definition

The analytic hierarchy process is used to help decision making when working with projects, programs or portfolios, where multiple criteria needs to be considered. The process keeps the decision unbiased and objective by the use of eigenvectors. The functions that are considered in AHP are structuring complexity, measurements and synthesis.

Practical guidelines /how to

When AHP is used in decision making, one will need to go through the 6 steps that is: 1. Define scope 2. Hierarchy 3. Pair wise comparison 4. Scoring and consistency 5. Evaluation of the alternatives 6. Make the decision

Benefits and limitations

The benefit of AHP is its ability to handle more criteria than the human mind can, which will increase the amount of correct decisions made. Furthermore AHP decreases the amount of subjectivity used to make decisions as it leaves out biases. AHP is a time-consuming process the first time it is used, however after several uses it is more easily applied.

Further explanation of these methods can be found via: [2]

Tool 5: Innovation Portfolio Management (IPM) (Morten)

Definition

The concept behind innovation portfolio management (IPM) is to bring innovative products to the market that is in line with the strategic vision of the company. It does this by using four main goals, which are strategic alignment, maximizing portfolio value, balancing number of projects and balancing time frame of the projects.

Practical guidelines /how to

IPM is best utilized by splitting the work into a strategic and an operational part, each having two activities to be controlled. Strategic innovation portfolio management (SIPM) covers balancing of the portfolio by different criteria. Secondly the projects of the portfolio is evaluated and prioritized in a cyclic manner. Operational innovation portfolio management (OIPM) has the activities of tactical resource allocation and constant review and adjustment of products in the portfolio.

Benefits and limitations

A benefit of IPM is that it gives the company high flexibility as it is routinely reviewing and adjusting the portfolio to fit changes of the market. However IPM has not been used by many companies and is still a new method to be used in the industry. This creates some uncertainty as the method has not been tested thoroughly yet.

Further explanation of these methods can be found via: [3]

Tool 6: XXX (Andy)

Definition

Practical guidelines /how to

Benefits and limitations

Tool 7: XXX (Andy)

Definition

Practical guidelines /how to

Benefits and limitations