Talk:The Role of the Project Sponsor
Contents |
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity The text sounds coherent, but there's room for improvement (see below)
Language Can be improved - Remember to add "it" before "is" in some of your sentences
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good
Purpose explanation Good, but who is your reader? Is it the project manager? Is your article based on best practices from a particular industry?
Title of the Wiki Good title
References Good reference to PMBOK and KPMG survey. Are there other appropriate references you can make to the mandatory list?
General Interesting topic. Consider also comparing the Project Owner to the Project Sponsor and Project Manager. May be also briefly talk about project governance amongst the different stakeholders if it makes sense.
Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz
Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 1
Answer here
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2
Answer here
Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3
Answer here
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4
Answer here
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5
Answer here
Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6
Answer here
Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7
Answer here
