Talk:Multi project management

From apppm
Revision as of 16:38, 22 September 2015 by Alise (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Josef: Hello, thank you for the abstract. "Multi project management" is a fairly broad category. I suggest that you re-think after todays program management lecture if you would like to take a program management or portfolio management angle. All the topics you raise are relevant, but there are also potentially a lot more that you could cover. So it is not entirely clear to me why you chose that particular subset. I would suggest to either focus on one particular aspect, or provide a more high-level overview that can then be "complete". Also please make sure to follow the suggested structure.

Reviewer 3: Alise

  • A well-written article and nice structure.
  • I don’t think you should use “I” and “we” in the article. It is supposed to be objective, and makes it look less professional.
  • Try not to use questions. Try to structure it in a different way.
  • I like the sentence you use to explain the difference. But since you have made it such a big deal, maybe use the italic or bold to highlight it.
  • Try to stay away from words like “actually”, “just” and “only”. Depending on how they are used in a sentence it may not sound very professional.
  • What are the 2 steps before reaching a Program Management point of view? Tell the reader where he or she will read about it.
  • I like the pictures and how they relate to the text. They are not, however, directly mentioned in the text.
  • Earlier, it was not right to start a sentence with “and” or “but”. This has changed, but you might just be aware of it and not use it all the time.
  • Some sentences are very long. Try to shorten them.
  • Remember references!
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox