Situational mapping
Contents |
Abstract
Whenever a project or program is conducted it is oftentimes with the intention of changing the status quo of the current situation. It is therefore not so irrelevant to know what the situation is and what impact the offered change in the status quo will have on the situation. Any given situation consists (for the most parts) of the same elements; human and nonhumam, material and symbolic/discursive elements. The "human" element is everything human related and can in relation to PPPM best be described as "stakeholders". Knowing stakeholders and their relation to the situation is important but understand all elements of the situation is even more important. By knowing the other elements of the situation a project/program manager can mitigate even more risks and uncertainties that are dwelling in the complexity of their activities.
Situational mapping is an analytical tool and a prerequisite to another situational analysis tool "Development Arena", when used can give a better understanding of the situation the project or program is trying to change. Situational mapping consists of three different maps; Messy map, Ordered map and Relational map. The maps worked with in a chronological order with the last being the relational map.
Introduction
Situational mapping - a prerequisite for the Development Arena
Situational mapping as a PPPM tool
Application
Limitations
Annotated bibliography
- Clark, A. (2005). Doing Situational Maps and Analysis - Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn
- Clark, A. & Star, S. (2008).The social worlds framework: a theory-methods package . - The New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies
- Jørgensen, U. & Sørensen, O. (2002) Arenas of Development - A Space populated by Actor-Worlds, Artefacts and Surprises
