Hersey and Blanchard's Situational Leadership

From apppm
Revision as of 22:19, 19 February 2019 by Ftsn (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

The general way of leading people can vary greatly between countries, cultures and industries, and has changed significantly over the last decades. The classic way of leading people was with a centralized decision-making in a top-to-bottom-approach, where management settled upon a direction, in which the people on the floor was commanded to follow. Today the general model of leading has been turned upside down, and now has the bottom-to-top approach, where employees can make decisions themselves, and are now recognized for their competences [1].

As a project manager, one of the key roles when facilitating a project, is to lead a given project team in the desired direction. This is done by utilizing and improving each team members core competences, whilst developing and supporting their weaker points, but this can be quite a challenge. Leadership is an art form, and there are about as many ways of leading people, as there are leaders. One way of doing it, is through an adaptive leadership style, where the style of leadership is dependent on the given situation at the given time. This form of leadership is called 'Situational Leadership' (SL), and proposes four different leadership styles, that each are appropriate at different stages of the team’s development:

  • Directing
  • Coaching
  • Supporting
  • Delegating

The stage of development in the team is very dynamic and will change over time. The style of leadership must therefore be adaptive to accommodate these changes [2].

Throughout this article, the history of the SL-framework, the framework itself, and its area of application will be explained. The statements will be supported with relevant examples, and there will furthermore be accounted for the limitations of the SL-framework.


Contents

About Situational Leadership

In the 1960'es, two American psychologists named Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard came up with the theory of SL in their publishing of a book called “Management of Organizational Behavior.” In this SL was introduced which denotes a way of adapting the style of leadership to the individual in four different ways. OVERGANG FOR MEDARBEJDERE MED UDGANGSPUNKT I HVOR I FIGUREN DE BEFINDER SIG NU

describe the model, explain its purpose, should reflect the current state of the art on the topic

3.4.5.1 The words leadership and management are often used interchangeably. However, they are not synonymous. The word management is more closely associated with directing another person to get from one point to another using a known set of expected behaviors. In contrast, leadership involves working with others through discussion or debate in order to guide them from one point to another. The method that a project manager chooses to employ reveals a distinct difference in behavior, self-perception, and project role. Table 3-1 compares management and leadership on several important levels. Project managers need to employ both leadership and management in order to be successful. The skill is in finding finding the right balance for each situation. The way in which management and leadership are employed often shows up in the project manager’s leadership style.


Key point to note: most effective style of leadership is dependent on the situation you find yourself in in that moment of time - which will change over time, and you will therefore need to adapt to this

- Framework that states that the best leadership style will vary depending on your situation - Model proposes four different styles of leadership; each appropriate at a different stage of subordinate development (directing, coaching, supporting, delegating)



Applications

Guidance on how to use the tool, and when it is applicable

Limitations

Critically reflect on the tool, when possible, substantiate claims with litterature

Annotated bibliography

Provide key references (3-10), where a reader can find additional information on the subject. Summarize and outline the relevance of eact reference to the topic (around 100 words pr. reference). Bibliography is not counted in the suggested 3000 word target length of the article

Refrences

  1. Project Management: A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide)6th Edition (2017) by the Project Management Institute (PMI), section 3.4.5
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pykuvuA-QFU seen on 2019.02.19 uploaded by EPM
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox