Talk:A method to analyze visualizations in project management as boundary objects
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "==review2, s150894== Overall: * The subject seems interesting! * It is easy to understand and follow the article. The language is good and clear. * I like that you link to ot...") |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* There are one line in the text I did not quite understand: “ “[Boundary objects] provides a basis upon which actors from different social worlds can achieve a common understanding despite their differing interests and perceptions" Garrety and Badham social worlds different types of boundaries”. This is from the “Boundary objects”. | * There are one line in the text I did not quite understand: “ “[Boundary objects] provides a basis upon which actors from different social worlds can achieve a common understanding despite their differing interests and perceptions" Garrety and Badham social worlds different types of boundaries”. This is from the “Boundary objects”. | ||
* The introduction could be called the abstract and you could use some images, to make your points clearer. | * The introduction could be called the abstract and you could use some images, to make your points clearer. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Reviewer 1, s145170== | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Overall:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Very interesting, complicated and up-to-date topic | ||
| + | * I like that you managed to come up with a strucutre that supports your choice of topic | ||
| + | * The overall "method" structure is followed succesfully | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Recommendations:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The introduction, which adequately describes the content of the article, could easily be converted into the abstract part (you do not need the introduction part according to the "methods" structure) | ||
| + | * As it is a complex topic, maybe more references were needed to be included in the text | ||
| + | * The chapter "Visualization as boundary objects" could be analysed further in a more simple way, as it seems to me a bit complicated and with cohesion problems. | ||
| + | * There are some grammatical errors | ||
| + | * Some figures could be added to help with the better understanding of the text, especially in your case that you are talking about "visualisation". | ||
| + | |||
| + | In general, I really like the choice of topic and the way in which you decided to present it. | ||
Revision as of 23:09, 22 September 2015
review2, s150894
Overall:
- The subject seems interesting!
- It is easy to understand and follow the article. The language is good and clear.
- I like that you link to other terms that you use in your article and that you give clear examples, it give a better flow in the text.
- I am excited to read the rest of the article.
Some suggestions for improvement:
- There are not a lot to improve at your text. It is good and reflected.
- There are one line in the text I did not quite understand: “ “[Boundary objects] provides a basis upon which actors from different social worlds can achieve a common understanding despite their differing interests and perceptions" Garrety and Badham social worlds different types of boundaries”. This is from the “Boundary objects”.
- The introduction could be called the abstract and you could use some images, to make your points clearer.
Reviewer 1, s145170
Overall:
- Very interesting, complicated and up-to-date topic
- I like that you managed to come up with a strucutre that supports your choice of topic
- The overall "method" structure is followed succesfully
Recommendations:
- The introduction, which adequately describes the content of the article, could easily be converted into the abstract part (you do not need the introduction part according to the "methods" structure)
- As it is a complex topic, maybe more references were needed to be included in the text
- The chapter "Visualization as boundary objects" could be analysed further in a more simple way, as it seems to me a bit complicated and with cohesion problems.
- There are some grammatical errors
- Some figures could be added to help with the better understanding of the text, especially in your case that you are talking about "visualisation".
In general, I really like the choice of topic and the way in which you decided to present it.
