Talk:BIM as a project management tool on construction projects
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Anna: Very nice topic choice that fits both the requirements for the type of article and the desired structure! Look forward to reading more about this tool.") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Anna: Very nice topic choice that fits both the requirements for the type of article and the desired structure! Look forward to reading more about this tool. | Anna: Very nice topic choice that fits both the requirements for the type of article and the desired structure! Look forward to reading more about this tool. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reviewer 1: AndreasAndersen | ||
| + | * The first-hand impression of the article is very good and very reader-friendly | ||
| + | * The beginning of the article starts first with a description of how the article are structured and afterwards a short introduction to the topic. I would consider to start with the short introduction to the topic because the first thing a viewer are reading in an article should be appetiser so the reader will continue reading. | ||
| + | * The figures in the article are understandable and looks nice. But remember to specify the figure names under the figures in the same word. Right know are Figure xx or Fig xx being used. Try to choose either Figure or fig. It will not be so confusing and looks better. | ||
| + | * When describen figure 2 it is done out of the character´s 9 points but not in the same order as in the figure. That can be a bit confusion. For example are the points ”HR” and ”Communication” side by side in the figure but HR is described in the beginning of the section and communication is written in the end of the section. This should be changed so the order of the text and figure fits. | ||
| + | * In the middel of the article are there a big table. The table should also have a table number and table name in order to refer to the table in article. | ||
| + | * Comparing the topic of the article to other topics like Gannt Chart and Work Breakdown Structure gives a good understanding of the subject compared to serveral known methods. | ||
Revision as of 18:33, 22 September 2015
Anna: Very nice topic choice that fits both the requirements for the type of article and the desired structure! Look forward to reading more about this tool.
Reviewer 1: AndreasAndersen
- The first-hand impression of the article is very good and very reader-friendly
- The beginning of the article starts first with a description of how the article are structured and afterwards a short introduction to the topic. I would consider to start with the short introduction to the topic because the first thing a viewer are reading in an article should be appetiser so the reader will continue reading.
- The figures in the article are understandable and looks nice. But remember to specify the figure names under the figures in the same word. Right know are Figure xx or Fig xx being used. Try to choose either Figure or fig. It will not be so confusing and looks better.
- When describen figure 2 it is done out of the character´s 9 points but not in the same order as in the figure. That can be a bit confusion. For example are the points ”HR” and ”Communication” side by side in the figure but HR is described in the beginning of the section and communication is written in the end of the section. This should be changed so the order of the text and figure fits.
- In the middel of the article are there a big table. The table should also have a table number and table name in order to refer to the table in article.
- Comparing the topic of the article to other topics like Gannt Chart and Work Breakdown Structure gives a good understanding of the subject compared to serveral known methods.
