Talk:Goal hierarchy or Goal Breakdown Structure

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: - The gramme is en general fine. Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article inform...")
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message?  
 
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message?  
 
LBH:  
 
LBH:  
- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. More than just the examples.
+
- The Introduction/Abstract is more an introduction than an abstract. I would suggest to change it more into an abstract, which is the demand from the teaches.
- Second sections headline, is it really called "the big idea"?  
+
Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate.   
- Section "Create a vison", edit the bullet setup. It is a little confusing as it is now.
+
 
  
 
What do you like?  
 
What do you like?  

Revision as of 18:45, 25 February 2019

Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: - The gramme is en general fine.

Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? LBH: - The Introduction/Abstract is more an introduction than an abstract. I would suggest to change it more into an abstract, which is the demand from the teaches. - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate.


What do you like? LBH: - Good and relevant subject and good use of examples. - What should be improved, and how? Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article.

Content: Is the article convincing? LBH: - Semi. More clarity of the purpose is needed, but if this is defined it will be.

Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? LBH: More detain of the topic would favour the article.

What parts do you like? LBH: - The section with exampels and limitation is good.

What parts need to be improve LBH: - More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox