Talk:Goal hierarchy or Goal Breakdown Structure
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? | Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? | ||
LBH: | LBH: | ||
| − | - The Introduction/Abstract is more an introduction than an abstract. I would suggest to change it more into an abstract, which is the demand from the teaches. | + | - The Introduction/Abstract is more an introduction than an abstract. I would suggest to change it more into an abstract, which is the demand from the teaches. The section "Goal herierchy in program" Could almost just be put in front of the Introduction/Abstract and used as the abstract. |
- Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. | - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate. | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 25 February 2019
Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors? LBH: - The gramme is en general fine.
Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? LBH: - The Introduction/Abstract is more an introduction than an abstract. I would suggest to change it more into an abstract, which is the demand from the teaches. The section "Goal herierchy in program" Could almost just be put in front of the Introduction/Abstract and used as the abstract. - Be more explicit in the abstract of what it is you want investigate.
What do you like?
LBH:
- Good and relevant subject and good use of examples.
- What should be improved, and how? Insure that all the sections are connected and supports the one purpose of the article.
Content: Is the article convincing? LBH: - Semi. More clarity of the purpose is needed, but if this is defined it will be.
Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? LBH: More detain of the topic would favour the article.
What parts do you like? LBH: - The section with exampels and limitation is good.
What parts need to be improve LBH: - More clarity of the purpose of the article in the abstract and throughout the article.
