Talk:Olympic Games London 2012: When the client strives for innovation (The London model)

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Overall impression)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
==Olympic Games London 2012: When the client strives for innovation (The London Model)==
 
==Olympic Games London 2012: When the client strives for innovation (The London Model)==
 
=== Overall impression ===
 
=== Overall impression ===
  I see that you have not finished your 5 and 6 chapter, so I will not comment on those.  
+
   
 +
I see that you have not finished your 5 and 6 chapter, so I will not comment on those.  
 
*I think the article looks clean and it is nice to read.  
 
*I think the article looks clean and it is nice to read.  
 
*It is a big topic, but I think you narrow it down really well.  
 
*It is a big topic, but I think you narrow it down really well.  
*I feel like it is giving a nice overview of the Olympics and its challenges.  
+
*I feel like it is giving a nice overview of the Olympics and its challenges.
 +
 
 
===Rooms for improvement===  
 
===Rooms for improvement===  
 
*In such a big topics I feel like you can use your references more often. But since I can’t see the material you have used, it is a bit difficult to say if I am correct.   
 
*In such a big topics I feel like you can use your references more often. But since I can’t see the material you have used, it is a bit difficult to say if I am correct.   

Revision as of 19:08, 22 September 2015

Kristine: Very interesting project to look into. As it is a huge project it is easy to get sidetracked. If you have not already done this, it might be helpful for yourself to have a clear idea of what the red thread of this case is going to be, before you start to go into the different aspects. Very nice to see you have the structure figured out nicely.


Contents

S150801 Reviewer 3

Olympic Games London 2012: When the client strives for innovation (The London Model)

Overall impression

I see that you have not finished your 5 and 6 chapter, so I will not comment on those.

  • I think the article looks clean and it is nice to read.
  • It is a big topic, but I think you narrow it down really well.
  • I feel like it is giving a nice overview of the Olympics and its challenges.

Rooms for improvement

  • In such a big topics I feel like you can use your references more often. But since I can’t see the material you have used, it is a bit difficult to say if I am correct.
  • The Illustrations are really good, but is it your own? Or do you have copyright to use them?
  • Since it is a big topic, I would have liked to have more under topics. Just to keep it easier to follow. I fell of a couple of times

Otherwise the article and the structure is good

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox