Talk:Project Evaluation and Selection for the Formation of the Optimal Portfolio

review by Saeh0803

1. Very long summary, maybe you can make it a bit short and interesting for reader

• Is the article free of grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors--> yes
• Is the article written in an engaging style, e.g. short, precise sentences instead of long winded, hard to follow mega -sentences? --> Puhaaa, I think it is difficult to understand and follow, you both have long sentences and many explanations
• Are all main points illustrated with an appropriate figure?
• Are the figures free of formal errors--> yes
• Are the figures referenced in the text? -->
• Does the author have the copyright or right to use the figures (e.g.through Creative) common Non-Commercial share Alike attribution?)

is the article formatted properly, i.e. are the typical Wiki-features such sub-headings, proper bullet-point list and Wiki-style references used? are graphics, videos ect. integrated correctly?